A Guide to Determining Soil Bearing Capacity


How Strong is the Ground? A Guide to Determining Soil Bearing Capacity

Before any structure can rise, its builders must first look down. The single most important question in foundation design is: "Can the ground support the load?" 

The answer lies in determining the soil bearing capacity, a term that defines the maximum pressure a soil can withstand before it fails or settles excessively.

Failure to get this number right is not an option. An overestimated bearing capacity can lead to catastrophic structural failure, while an underestimated one leads to over-designed, unnecessarily expensive foundations. The geotechnical investigation is how we find the correct, safe value.

The process boils down to two key concepts:

  1. Ultimate Bearing Capacity (q_u): This is the theoretical pressure at which the soil will fail through shearing—think of it as the ground punching through.

  2. Allowable Bearing Capacity (q_a): This is the practical, safe number used for design. It is the ultimate capacity divided by a Factor of Safety (typically 2.5 to 3) to account for uncertainties and to limit settlement.

So, how do we find this critical value? We use a combination of field tests, lab tests, and proven engineering formulas.

Method 1: In-Situ (Field) Testing

Field tests are the most common and direct way to assess soil properties as they exist on-site.

  • Standard Penetration Test (SPT): This is the workhorse of geotechnical investigations. A "split-spoon" sampler is hammered into the soil at the bottom of a borehole. The number of blows required to drive the sampler a specific distance (one foot) is recorded as the "N-value." This N-value is a powerful indicator of soil density and strength. Engineers use established empirical formulas (like Meyerhof's) to directly correlate the corrected N-value to the allowable bearing capacity.

  • Cone Penetration Test (CPT): A more advanced method, the CPT involves pushing an instrumented cone into the soil at a constant rate. It continuously measures cone resistance (q_c) and sleeve friction (f_s). This provides a detailed profile of the soil layers and their properties. These (q_c) values can then be used in formulas to calculate the ultimate bearing capacity.

  • Plate Load Test: This is the most direct method. A large steel plate is placed on the soil at the proposed foundation depth, and a hydraulic jack is used to apply load in increments. The settlement is measured at each step. This test provides a real-world load-settlement curve, from which engineers can directly determine the ultimate bearing capacity of the soil at that specific location.

Method 2: Laboratory Tests & Analytical Formulas

Field tests are often supplemented by laboratory tests on soil samples (both disturbed from the SPT and undisturbed "Shelby" tubes).

  1. Soil Classification: First, the soil is classified (e.g., clay, sand, silt) to determine its behavior.

  2. Shear Strength Tests: Tests like the Direct Shear Test or Triaxial Shear Test are performed to find the soil's two critical strength parameters:

    • Cohesion (c): The "stickiness" of the soil, crucial in clays.

    • Angle of Internal Friction (\phi): The resistance to sliding between soil grains, crucial in sands.

  3. The Terzaghi Equation: These (c) and (\phi) values are then plugged into the foundational formula of soil mechanics: Terzaghi's Bearing Capacity Equation.

This formula calculates the ultimate bearing capacity (q_u) by combining the soil's cohesion, the surcharge (weight of the soil above the foundation), and the weight of the soil itself. 

The equation uses "bearing capacity factors" (N_c, N_q, N_{\gamma}), which are standard values derived from the soil's friction angle (\phi).

Ultimately, a geotechnical engineer never relies on a single test. 

They synthesize all the data—SPT N-values, CPT readings, lab-tested strength parameters, and the position of the water table—to build a comprehensive model of the ground. 

From this model, they determine a final, safe allowable bearing capacity that ensures the structure will stand for generations.

A Guide to Locating the Water Table


Beyond the Surface: A Guide to Locating the Water Table

Before the first concrete pour or foundation trench is dug, a critical question must be answered: Where is the water? What you can't see underground can become the most expensive problem for a construction project. 

This unseen boundary is the water table, the upper level of the earth's saturated zone, where all pores and fractures in the soil and rock are filled with water.

Locating the water table is not just a formality; it is a fundamental component of any geotechnical investigation. An accurate assessment is essential for safe, durable, and cost-effective design.

Why the Water Table is a Critical Design Parameter

Failure to properly identify the water table can lead to catastrophic failures. The key risks include:

  • Foundation Stability: High groundwater levels exert buoyant (uplift) force on foundations, which can compromise the stability of basements and other subterranean structures. High pore water pressure also reduces the load-bearing capacity of soil, potentially leading to settlement.

  • Excavation and Shoring: Excavating below the water table is like digging a hole on the beach. Water will flow in, requiring complex and costly dewatering systems. The saturated soil is also much weaker, increasing the risk of trench collapse.

  • Material Degradation: Groundwater can be chemically aggressive, containing sulfates or chlorides that can degrade concrete and corrode steel rebar over time.

The Gold Standard: Direct Observation Methods

The most reliable methods for locating the water table involve direct observation.

  1. Boreholes and Test Pits This is the most common method used during a geotechnical investigation. Engineers drill boreholes (deep, narrow holes) or dig test pits (shallow, wide pits) to the target depth. The hole is typically left open for a period (often 24 hours) to allow groundwater to seep in and stabilize. The level at which the water rests is then measured.

  2. Piezometers and Monitoring Wells A single measurement from a borehole is just a snapshot in time. To get the full picture, engineers install permanent instruments.

    • Piezometers: A piezometer is a small-diameter pipe installed in a borehole, designed specifically to measure the piezometric level (water pressure) at a specific point. This is crucial for understanding pore water pressure in clay layers.

    • Monitoring Wells: A monitoring well is similar but typically wider. Its primary purpose is not only to measure the water level, but also to allow for water samples to be collected for chemical analysis.

    To measure the water level inside these installations, technicians use a handheld "dip meter" or "electric sounder." This device consists of a weighted probe on a marked tape; when the probe touches the conductive water, it completes a circuit, setting off a beep or a light at the surface.

High-Tech Mapping: Geophysical Methods

For large sites, drilling dozens of boreholes is impractical. Geophysical methods can "map" the water table from the surface without drilling.

  • Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT): This is the most popular geophysical technique. It involves passing a small electrical current through the ground. Because water-saturated soil conducts electricity much better (i.e., has lower resistivity) than dry soil, the resulting data can be modeled to create a 2D or 3D map of the subsurface, clearly identifying the water table.

  • Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR): GPR works by sending high-frequency radar waves into the ground. The interface between the unsaturated soil (the vadose zone) and the saturated soil (the phreatic zone) creates a strong reflection, allowing the water table to be identified.

The Most Important Rule: The Water Table Fluctuates

A measurement taken in the dry season is dangerously misleading. The water table is not static; it rises during wet seasons and drops during droughts.

For engineering design, the only number that matters is the Seasonal High Water Table (SHWT). A thorough geotechnical investigation will use data from piezometers, soil indicators, and local records to estimate this highest-expected level. 

Designing for the SHWT ensures the foundation will remain stable and the basement dry, even during the wettest time of the year.

Ultimately, locating the water table is a cornerstone of risk management, preventing costly surprises and ensuring the long-term integrity of the structure.

Geotechnical Investigation

Construction of an embankment

1. Geotechnical Investigation

A geotechnical investigation is a fundamental first step in any construction project. This phase involves all necessary soil studies and analyses to provide critical data for engineering and design.

Upon completion, the geotechnical firm will submit a final report. This report must provide comprehensive technical details, conclusions, and actionable recommendations. The report shall include:

A. Descriptive Summary

A complete summary of all field operations (e.g., borings, test pits) and laboratory tests performed. This section must include a site plan or sketch that clearly indicates the location of all exploratory tests.

B. Summary of Results

A detailed presentation of all data and results, specified in graphs, tables (numerical values), and a clear narrative. This must include:

  • Soil classification according to the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS).

  • Mean and recommended soil resistivity values (for grounding and corrosion analysis).

  • All other relevant engineering parameters, such as the modulus of subgrade reaction (dynamic ballast coefficient).

C. Final Recommendations

A concluding report with clear recommendations for the project's design and construction. These recommendations must provide the technical specifications required for the project, covering the following key areas:

  1. Earthwork Operations: Recommendations for excavation methods, stable slope angles, and requirements for any necessary dewatering systems.

  2. Foundation Recommendations (Shallow & Deep):

    • Shallow Foundations: Recommended foundation types, allowable soil bearing capacity at various depths, coefficients of friction, and settlement estimates.

    • Deep Foundations (Piles): Recommended pile types, estimated end-bearing capacity, and skin-friction (shaft) capacity.

  3. Soil and Water Aggressiveness: An analysis of the soil and groundwater's potential to corrode or degrade foundation materials. This will include specific recommendations for the appropriate type of cement (e.g., Type II, Type V) to be used in foundations.

  4. Water Table Analysis: Determination of the depth, location, and potential seasonal variations of the groundwater table.

  5. Structural Fill:

    • Analysis of the suitability of on-site soils for use as structural fill.

    • If on-site material is unsuitable, specifications for imported fill material.

    • Detailed compaction requirements, including applicable standards (e.g., ASTM), required Proctor density, and minimum load-bearing values (e.g., CBR). These parameters must be met by all on-site or imported fill material.

2. Site Survey and Hydrological Analysis

This phase establishes the existing conditions of the site and is typically performed before major field work or site clearing begins.

A. Topographic Survey

The Contractor must conduct a comprehensive topographic survey of the entire property, including all access points and external drainage features. This survey will establish:

  • Permanent benchmarks (fixed leveling points).

  • Reference axes and a site grid (e.g., 20m x 20m) that will be used for all project layouts.

B. Hydrological & Flood Analysis

In addition to the survey, a hydrological analysis is required to determine the site's flood risk. This study must use historical data, statistics, and on-site information to establish design flood levels, ensuring that future climatic events do not disrupt the service continuity of the completed facility.

C. Site Plan

The survey and grid will be used to create the base site plan. This plan will be the foundation for all subsequent design, including:

  • Clearing and grubbing (deforestation).

  • Site grading and embankments.

  • Stormwater drainage conduit and systems.

SOIL STUDY

ARCHITECTS| CONSTRUCTION | SOIL STUDIES

A Guide to Soil Classification in Geotechnical Engineering
Why We Classify Soils

Engineers, primarily geotechnical engineers, classify soils according to their engineering properties. This classification is essential for determining a soil's suitability for use as foundation support or as a construction material. 
Modern engineering classification systems are designed to provide a smooth transition from field observations to preliminary predictions of soil's engineering properties and behaviors.

The Unified Soil Classification System (USCS)

The most common engineering classification system for soils in North America is the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS)
The USCS has three major classification groups:
  • Coarse-grained soils (e.g., sands and gravels)
  • Fine-grained soils (e.g., silts and clays)
  • Highly organic soils (referred to as "peat")
The USCS further subdivides these three major classes to provide a more detailed and descriptive classification.

Other Classification Systems

While the USCS is dominant, other engineering soil classification systems are also used in the United States and internationally. 
These include the AASHTO Soil Classification System (commonly used in road and highway construction) and the Modified Burmeister system.

Beyond Classification: The Geotechnical Report

A soil's classification is just one component of a full analysis. A comprehensive geotechnical engineering report will also include many other properties of the soil, such as:
  • Color
  • In-situ moisture content
  • In-situ strength (derived from field tests)
Additional details on the material properties of the soil that are not covered by the USCS code alone.